Tag: dynasty trust

Why You Should Care About Estate Planning: Professionals

June 13, 2010 /

Moving along in my Intro to Estate Planning series, we will continue to look at why planning is important for  family of different types and at different life stages.  I started by uncovering the many benefits estate planning holds for parents with children under 18.  If you are a parent with children under 18 years old and still have questions, contact me to have your questions answered.

The next group we’ll look at is more of a “type” of family rather than a stage of life: professionals.  My definition of a “professional” is broad, including doctors, lawyers, certified public accountants (CPAs), accountants, bankers, financial advisers, nurses, teachers, middle- to high-level company managers, CEOs, company Presidents, and other similar positions.  I view this group so broadly because they all share similar concerns, at varying degrees.

Some important reasons proper estate planning is critical for professionals (and their families) include:

  • Guardianship remains one of the most important reasons to estate plan if you have children under 18 years old.  Without designating who you want to raise your children in your absence, a court will decide who will care for them. If you haven’t named guardians for your children, you should run, not walk to an attorney specializing in estate planning (and focusing on guardianship decision).  If you have named guardians, you most likely made at least 1 of 6 common mistakes.  Contact me to learn more!
  • Asset Protection. As a professional with a special skill, you face a greater threat of liability.  You have worked hard to accomplish great things and are building a secure financial future for your family.  Don’t leave it exposed to future divorce, lawsuits and creditors.  And this pertains as much to you as it does to your children and grandchildren (and on down the line).  You can pass your financial wealth on to them protected from divorce, lawsuit and creditors as well.
  • Planning for your incapacity to avoid bitter conflict about your finances and your health care. You need to give people you trust the legal authority, guidance and direction on how to handle your finances and your health care.  Enhanced Powers of Attorney, EnhancedPatient Advocate Designations, and Living Trusts are key components to making sure your wishes are recognized and followed.
  • Avoiding probate.  Without a proper plan in place, your hard earned wealth will go through a time consuming and often costly court process. Wouldn’t you rather your family be able to benefit right away and receive more of what you worked so hard to accomplish?
  • Passing on your “whole family wealth,” not just your money.  This includes your values, insights, stories and experiences – who you are and what is important to you.  In my experience this is THE most overlooked part of estate planning.  The professionals I’ve worked with have accomplished a lot and continue to reach new levels of accomplishment.  Yet in most circumstances they have not taken the time to explain their struggles, how they overcame, and what they learned – these are far more important than money to their kids, grandkids, and future generations.

These are just a few of the reasons professionals need an estate plan.  Can you think of more?  Please share your thoughts and experiences.

With my next post in the series, I will look at the “sandwich generation” – people who have concerns about their parents and their children.

Michael Lichterman is an attorney specializing in estate planning and helping provide peace of mind to families and businesses in Grand Rapids, Grandville, Cascade, Forest Hills, Ada, Byron Center, Caledonia, and the surrounding areas.  He specializes in “whole family wealth” planning for professionals with minor children, doctors, nurses, lawyers, and the “sandwich generation” (caring for parents and children) – and does so from a Christian perspective.  He takes the “counselor” part of attorney and counselor at law very seriously, and enjoys creating life long relationships with his clients – many of which have become great friends.

Make sure you pass on your “whole family wealth,” not just your money.  This includes your values, insights, stories and experiences – who you are and what is important to you.  In my experience this is THE most overlooked part of estate planning.  It happens to be one of the most fulfilling privileges I have when working with families.

Why Should I Care About Estate Planning?

June 3, 2010 /

Having figured out what estate planning “is” in my previous post, let’s move on to why estate planning is important.  Because the topic is so broad, I’m going to break it down and address it based on common life stages.  If you are curious how it applies to YOU, contact me and let’s talk about it.

Let’s start by looking at how critically important estate planning is for parents with kids under 18 years old.  It really doesn’t matter if all or some of your children are under 18.  These important issues apply if any of them is under 18:

  • Establish guardianship for your children under 18 – not doing so will leave their care up to a court to decide.  Someone who doesn’t know you and what’s important to you, your family dynamics, and your desires for your children’s future, will be the one making the decision who will raise them.
  • Establish temporary guardianship for your children – not doing so could leave them in the hands of child protective services or temporary/permanent foster care.
  • Make sure you have a comprehensive protection plan for your children so your babysitter, family, friends and guardians/temporary guardians know what to do if something happens to you and have the legal documentation to prove it.  We include instructions for these important people and even include a family emergency ID card for your wallet/purse.
  • Have your estate structured so your kids don’t succumb to “lottery winner syndrome” when they receive all of their inheritance outright at 18 years old.  Think about that for a second.  Let’s take an example: 2 children and an estate valued at $500,000 (and remember life insurance is included in the amount they receive).   Each child will receive whatever amount of their $250,000 share is not used up by the time they are 18.  Can you imagine?  Let’s say that ends up being $100,000.  How would you have handled $100,000 when you were 18?  I know how I would have handled it and it’s not pretty.  I read one study that said over half of outright inheritances are spent within 3 years of receiving them – no matter how much was received.
  • If you are a professional and subject to potential liability, make sure you structure your plan in a way that ensures your assets are there to benefit your kids and not lost to lawsuits, creditors and other liabilities.
  • Make sure you pass on your “whole family wealth,” not just your money.  This includes your values, insights, stories and experiences – who you are and what is important to you.  In my experience this is THE most overlooked part of estate planning.  It happens to be one of the most fulfilling privileges I have when working with families.
  • Have a health care directive (patient advocate designation) in place for yourself and your children to minimize conflict about your medical care.

These are just a few of the reasons families with kids under 18 need an estate plan.  Can you think of more?  Please share your thoughts and experiences.

With my next post in the series, I will look at why planning is vital for “professionals” – and you may be surprised how many families are in that group.

Michael Lichterman is an attorney specializing in estate planning and helping provide peace of mind to families and businesses in Grand Rapids, Grandville, Cascade, Forest Hills, Ada, Byron Center, Caledonia, and the surrounding areas.  He specializes in “whole family wealth” planning for professionals with minor children, doctors, nurses, lawyers, and the “sandwich generation” (caring for parents and children) – and does so from a Christian perspective.  He takes the “counselor” part of attorney and counselor at law very seriously, and enjoys creating life long relationships with his clients – many of which have become great friends.

Michael Lichterman is an attorney specializing in estate planning and helping provide peace of mind to families and businesses in Grand Rapids, Grandville, Cascade, Forest Hills, Ada, Byron Center, Caledonia, and the surrounding areas.  He specializes in “whole family wealth” planning for professionals with minor children, doctors, nurses, lawyers, and the “sandwich generation” (caring for parents and children) – and does so from a Christian perspective.  He takes the “counselor” part of attorney and counselor at law very seriously, and enjoys creating life long relationships with his clients – many of which have become great friends.

Make Your Heirs Rich, Not Your Lawyer

May 7, 2010 /

Say what?  Yes, you read that right.  It is the title of an article I read at the Motley Fool (read it by clicking here).  The main focus of the article is how you want to be remembered after you are gone and how your estate planning (0r lack thereof) can greatly influence your legacy.  They put quite an emphasis on wills, which is interesting because many of the more complex situations the article talks about are far better handled through a trust.  And in some of the examples, a will is almost completely inadequate.  I would also suggest that you review your plan every 3 years, at a minimum, rather than the 5 suggested by the article.  Think back three years and ask yourself how much the law, your life, and what you own has changed.  Those items change on a regular basis – so should your plan.

I’m happy to see them mention estate planning in the context of disability planning.  This is often overlooked . . . sadly, even by some lawyers.  Estate planning is not just “death planning.”   It is more than that . . . it is ensuring that the right decisions are made on your behalf if you are unable to make them yourself due to incapacity or disability.

What do you think about the article and the issues raised by it?  Please feel free to share – I enjoy reading and responding to the comments and emails.

Be Careful Who You Pick As A Trustee

May 4, 2010 /

Although statistics show that the number of people who have an estate plan is not increasing, I do see a larger portion of individuals and couples making the decision to have a trust-based estate plan.  That is, an estate plan where a trust is the main document that controls how things are distributed when they pass away.  One of, if not the, most important decisions you make with a trust-based plan is who will be the trustee and who will be the backup (“successor”) trustees.  The trustee is the person/people/entity that makes sure the terms of the trust are followed.  Depending on the trust’s design, the trustee may have a large amount of discretion on who receives money/property from the trust, how they receive it, and when they receive it.  Yet, in many cases, the decision on who will be the trustees/successor trusties is made hastily, without much thought.

This can be a big mistake!  If you have done your planning correctly and fully “funded” your trust (e.g., transferred assets to it), your trust will have most (if not all) of your assets.  Considering that the trustee will make certain decisions relating to the trust, the choice should not be taken lightly.  The trustee should be someone you trust (no pun intended . . . ok, yes, the pun was intended).  However, don’t stop the inquiry there.  It should also be someone who has sufficient financial management and administrative ability (or is wise enough to hire professionals to handle those tasks for them).  And consider the option of splitting the trustee role  among one or more people/entities.  For example, you could have a “distribution trustee” who determines when to make distributions, and an “administrative trustee” who keeps track of all the accounting, tax, and other detailed financial matters.

I recently had a conversation with a great client.  She shared with me that her father had a trust set up and properly “funded” (I say bravo to him, because not “funding” the trust is the single biggest mistake I see when reviewing estate plans).  He named a local bank as the trustee for distribution and administrative purposes.  He set out several scenarios in his trust about how he wanted to provide for his children (education, businesses, homes, etc.).   One of the main assets in the trust was stock in a certain company.  Long story short, the stock dropped significantly in value and the trustee (the bank) would not sell it.  It believed the stock would come back and that to sell it at the depressed price would violate the bank’s duty as trustee.  This all happened about the time this client was supposed to be getting a distribution to help with education.  She never did get the distribution for education (or much else for that matter).  The good part is that she did a great job on her own and is quite successful today.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t consider a bank or trust company as a trustee, I give the example to show how important it is to fully consider the various options for who the trustee is.  Each situation is different.  That is why you need to make sure your estate planning attorney takes a client-centered relationship approach to your planning . . . not a transactional approach.

The Game Is On: Billionaire Dies – Stakes Raised On The Estate Tax Issue

April 20, 2010 /

As mentioned in this article over at The Trust Advisor Blog, the stakes are now raised on what Congress will do about the estate tax as a billionaire recently died.  With no estate tax in 2010 (as it stands now), it seems he may have passed his $9 billion (with a “b”) estate to his heirs completely free of estate tax.  If last year’s estate tax rules were still in effect now, the IRS could have collected roughly $4 billion (with a “b”) in estate tax on the estate.

As the article points out, it must be awfully tempting for Congress to reinstate the estate tax in 2010 at its 2009 level and, they say, make it retroactive to the first of the year.  I have to imagine that, given the amount of money at stake now, any attempt at retroactively enacting the estate tax would be challenged tooth and nail by an army of lawyers on Mr. Duncan’s behalf.  It will be very interesting to watch, that’s for sure.  I’ll make sure to keep you updated as I learn more.

A BIG Oops! How Do-It-Yourself Estate Planning Can Disinherit Your Children

April 18, 2010 /

Wondering how that could be possible?  Rania Combs, a Texas Wills and Trusts lawyer, has a great blog post entitled “Do-It-Yourself Estate Planning Mistake Disinherits Child.”  Take the time to read the article – it is a quick read and very well done.  The article is especially poignant, as I have had more cases recently involving children from previous marriages.  Rania’s post is just one of several ways that Do-It-Yourself planning can harm a family and just one of several ways that no planning (or inadequate planning) can hurt a mixed family.

There are only two things I will add to Rania’s excellent post:

  1. Not only does Jack’s new wife have complete control of Jack’s assets and no obligation to use them for Rose’s benefit, but what if the new wife gets remarried?  If she remarries and doesn’t do any planning herself (or does typical planning), there is a very real likelihood that Rose won’t get anything.  I’m not just conjecturing . . . that is based on circumstances I’ve seen.
  2. Not only could Jack have set aside all or a portion of his estate in trust for Rose’s benefit, he could have set the trust up to protect those assets from Rose’s creditors, judgments, estate taxes in her estate, and even her own divorce.

Have you had this happen to you or know someone who has?  I am interested in the story, if so.  Please share via comment on this post or emailing me via our Contact Us page.

And They Say Stuff Like This Never Happens! Why You Should Include Asset Protection in Your Planning

April 11, 2010 /

A recent conversation with a banker friend of mine confirmed the value of advanced estate planning techniques and how they apply in a practical, “real life” sense.

Her story was all to familiar – I hear about these situations on a regular basis.  During life, Husband and Wife had an estate plan drawn up.  At least one part of it was a joint trust with no asset protection  components.  They trusted each other, so they were not worried about the surviving spouse doing anything with the trust assets other than what they initially agreed between them.  When the first of them passes away, the surviving spouse will continue to have the power to revoke or amend the trust in any way.  Fast forward many years – wife has passed away and Husband has a new wife.  That’s where the bankers story gets interesting.  Husband revokes the trust, comes into the bank with new wife, and proceeds to put all the bank assets from the trust into a joint account with his new wife.

Now, do you think that is what his first wife would have wanted?  If they had a typical distribution plan, it would have been set up to continue for the surviving spouse (which it did) and then had it split equally among their children.  Well guess what?  It’s quite possible that the children will get nothing.  What is Husband passes away before his new wife?  His trust is revoked and the bank assets (which are substantial) are in joint accounts with his new wife.  If he dies first without anything changing, his new wife stands to get the vast majority of his assets.  Who knows what else he changed to benefit her . . . beneficiary on life insurance, retirement accounts, annuities, etc.

What could Husband and Wife had done to protect against this?  They could have set their estate plan up in a way that guaranteed that not only a large portion of the assets would have gone to their children (no matter what!), but those assets could have been protected from Husband’s creditors, lawsuits against him, and yes, from a future spouse and even divorce.

Don’t misunderstand me, I am a HUGE proponent of marriage and think Husband and Wife should have trusted each other like they did.  I don’t see this advanced planning as saying you don’t trust your spouse, I see it as making sure that you protect as much as possible of what Husband and Wife worked so hard to create together and ensuring that it continues to benefit their family and not the government or creditors.  And this protection becomes even more important the higher your exposure to creditors is . . . for example, high-risk businesses, doctors, lawyers, and other professionals.

This is something I cover with ALL of my clients.  And no matter who you work with, make sure they understand how this protection can be beneficial and – more importantly – how to do it right!

What do you think?  Please share your thoughts.  I always enjoy comments from my blog readers.