Tag: trust

What Is Estate Planning?

May 31, 2010 /

Based on some recent conversations, it has become clear to me that there is much confusion about estate planning.  What is it?  What does it mean?  Why do it?  How to do it?  Why work with an attorney?  And many more questions I hear on a regular basis.  So, I’ll be doing a series of blog posts introducing estate planning and its various components.  I don’t know how many posts it will be.   I’m pulling many of the topics from my day-to-day conversations, so I’ll keep the series going as long as there are questions.  If you have questions, please ask! I’ll make sure to work your questions into this series.

So, the first question – what is estate planning?  Wikipedia defines estate planning as “the process of anticipating and arranging for the disposal of an estate.”  I believe a much better definition is one I heard from a colleague of mine from Wealth Counsel:

“I want to control my property while I’m alive, take care of me and my loved ones if I become disabled, and give what I have, to whom I want, the way I want, and when I want.  Furthermore, if I can, I want to save every last tax dollar, professional fee, and court cost legally possible.”

The one item I always add to that definition is: “to make sure that my children are cared for by who I want, in the way I want.”  Of course, this applies only to parents who have minor and/or disabled children.

So here we have the definition, the starting point.  Within the definition are many more considerations.  To accomplish these goals of estate planning, the following documents are commonly used: wills, trusts, general durable power of attorney, and health care powers of attorney/patient advocate designation.  And if you work with a comprehensive Grand Rapids estate planning attorney, there are additional considerations and documents meant to help you pass on your “whole family wealth” – not just what you own, but who you are and what’s important to you!  Because if you think about it, the money and the “stuff” will still be around when you pass away, but it is who you are as a person that will be lost – your values, insights, stories and experiences.  Check back for the next installment in this series to discover some additional considerations that are vital to having a great estate plan for your family.

Michael Lichterman is a dedicated estate planning attorney helping provide peace of mind to families and businesses in Grand Rapids, Grandville, Cascade, Forest Hills, Ada, Byron Center, Caledonia, and the surrounding areas.  He specializes in the needs of professionals with minor children, doctors, nurses, and those in the “sandwich generation” (caring for parents and children), and does so from a Christian perspective.  He takes the “counselor” part of attorney and counselor at law very seriously, and enjoys creating life long relationships with his clients – many of which have become great friends.

The Cheap, Online Will – A Real Life Example

May 11, 2010 /

Ok, you just have to read this post from Gregory Luce.  He is in the process of evaluating the differences between an online will and one drafted by an estate planning attorney.  He gives a very fair, well-reasoned analysis of the document and “extras” along with it – the positives and the negatives.  As can be expected, there are flaws in the document.  I encourage you to read the comments at the bottom of the post as they point out many areas of concern.  Some of the items could cause the “effect” of the will to be drastically different than what Mr. Luce intended.

Of course I made sure to add my $.02, which centered on the wholly inadequate guardianship provisions.  I regularly refer to 6 common mistakes that parents make when naming guardians for their children and most, if not all, of them show up in this situation.

Read the post, read the comments, and then let me know what you think.  Sure, it may be less in the short run to do the cheap online will and have the misplaced peace of mind it provides.  But at what cost?  Disinheriting a child?  Having someone challenge it and win?  Having someone taking care of your children who you would never choose . . . or not in the order you would choose?  I look forward to your comments!

Make Your Heirs Rich, Not Your Lawyer

May 7, 2010 /

Say what?  Yes, you read that right.  It is the title of an article I read at the Motley Fool (read it by clicking here).  The main focus of the article is how you want to be remembered after you are gone and how your estate planning (0r lack thereof) can greatly influence your legacy.  They put quite an emphasis on wills, which is interesting because many of the more complex situations the article talks about are far better handled through a trust.  And in some of the examples, a will is almost completely inadequate.  I would also suggest that you review your plan every 3 years, at a minimum, rather than the 5 suggested by the article.  Think back three years and ask yourself how much the law, your life, and what you own has changed.  Those items change on a regular basis – so should your plan.

I’m happy to see them mention estate planning in the context of disability planning.  This is often overlooked . . . sadly, even by some lawyers.  Estate planning is not just “death planning.”   It is more than that . . . it is ensuring that the right decisions are made on your behalf if you are unable to make them yourself due to incapacity or disability.

What do you think about the article and the issues raised by it?  Please feel free to share – I enjoy reading and responding to the comments and emails.

Be Careful Who You Pick As A Trustee

May 4, 2010 /

Although statistics show that the number of people who have an estate plan is not increasing, I do see a larger portion of individuals and couples making the decision to have a trust-based estate plan.  That is, an estate plan where a trust is the main document that controls how things are distributed when they pass away.  One of, if not the, most important decisions you make with a trust-based plan is who will be the trustee and who will be the backup (“successor”) trustees.  The trustee is the person/people/entity that makes sure the terms of the trust are followed.  Depending on the trust’s design, the trustee may have a large amount of discretion on who receives money/property from the trust, how they receive it, and when they receive it.  Yet, in many cases, the decision on who will be the trustees/successor trusties is made hastily, without much thought.

This can be a big mistake!  If you have done your planning correctly and fully “funded” your trust (e.g., transferred assets to it), your trust will have most (if not all) of your assets.  Considering that the trustee will make certain decisions relating to the trust, the choice should not be taken lightly.  The trustee should be someone you trust (no pun intended . . . ok, yes, the pun was intended).  However, don’t stop the inquiry there.  It should also be someone who has sufficient financial management and administrative ability (or is wise enough to hire professionals to handle those tasks for them).  And consider the option of splitting the trustee role  among one or more people/entities.  For example, you could have a “distribution trustee” who determines when to make distributions, and an “administrative trustee” who keeps track of all the accounting, tax, and other detailed financial matters.

I recently had a conversation with a great client.  She shared with me that her father had a trust set up and properly “funded” (I say bravo to him, because not “funding” the trust is the single biggest mistake I see when reviewing estate plans).  He named a local bank as the trustee for distribution and administrative purposes.  He set out several scenarios in his trust about how he wanted to provide for his children (education, businesses, homes, etc.).   One of the main assets in the trust was stock in a certain company.  Long story short, the stock dropped significantly in value and the trustee (the bank) would not sell it.  It believed the stock would come back and that to sell it at the depressed price would violate the bank’s duty as trustee.  This all happened about the time this client was supposed to be getting a distribution to help with education.  She never did get the distribution for education (or much else for that matter).  The good part is that she did a great job on her own and is quite successful today.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t consider a bank or trust company as a trustee, I give the example to show how important it is to fully consider the various options for who the trustee is.  Each situation is different.  That is why you need to make sure your estate planning attorney takes a client-centered relationship approach to your planning . . . not a transactional approach.

And They Say Stuff Like This Never Happens! Why You Should Include Asset Protection in Your Planning

April 11, 2010 /

A recent conversation with a banker friend of mine confirmed the value of advanced estate planning techniques and how they apply in a practical, “real life” sense.

Her story was all to familiar – I hear about these situations on a regular basis.  During life, Husband and Wife had an estate plan drawn up.  At least one part of it was a joint trust with no asset protection  components.  They trusted each other, so they were not worried about the surviving spouse doing anything with the trust assets other than what they initially agreed between them.  When the first of them passes away, the surviving spouse will continue to have the power to revoke or amend the trust in any way.  Fast forward many years – wife has passed away and Husband has a new wife.  That’s where the bankers story gets interesting.  Husband revokes the trust, comes into the bank with new wife, and proceeds to put all the bank assets from the trust into a joint account with his new wife.

Now, do you think that is what his first wife would have wanted?  If they had a typical distribution plan, it would have been set up to continue for the surviving spouse (which it did) and then had it split equally among their children.  Well guess what?  It’s quite possible that the children will get nothing.  What is Husband passes away before his new wife?  His trust is revoked and the bank assets (which are substantial) are in joint accounts with his new wife.  If he dies first without anything changing, his new wife stands to get the vast majority of his assets.  Who knows what else he changed to benefit her . . . beneficiary on life insurance, retirement accounts, annuities, etc.

What could Husband and Wife had done to protect against this?  They could have set their estate plan up in a way that guaranteed that not only a large portion of the assets would have gone to their children (no matter what!), but those assets could have been protected from Husband’s creditors, lawsuits against him, and yes, from a future spouse and even divorce.

Don’t misunderstand me, I am a HUGE proponent of marriage and think Husband and Wife should have trusted each other like they did.  I don’t see this advanced planning as saying you don’t trust your spouse, I see it as making sure that you protect as much as possible of what Husband and Wife worked so hard to create together and ensuring that it continues to benefit their family and not the government or creditors.  And this protection becomes even more important the higher your exposure to creditors is . . . for example, high-risk businesses, doctors, lawyers, and other professionals.

This is something I cover with ALL of my clients.  And no matter who you work with, make sure they understand how this protection can be beneficial and – more importantly – how to do it right!

What do you think?  Please share your thoughts.  I always enjoy comments from my blog readers.